Pointers to member functions

suggest change

To access a member function of a class, you need to have a “handle” to the particular instance, as either the instance itself, or a pointer or reference to it. Given a class instance, you can point to various of its members with a pointer-to-member, IF you get the syntax correct! Of course, the pointer has to be declared to be of the same type as what you are pointing to…

typedef int Fn(int); // Fn is a type-of function that accepts an int and returns an int

class Class {
public:
    // Note that A() is of type 'Fn'
    int A(int a) { return 2*a; }
    // Note that B() is of type 'Fn'
    int B(int b) { return 3*b; }
}; // Class

int main() {
    Class c;          // Need a Class instance to play with
    Class *p = &c;    // Need a Class pointer to play with

    Fn Class::*fn;    // fn is a pointer to a type-of Fn within Class

    fn = &Class::A;   // fn now points to A within any Class
    (c.*fn)(5);       // Pass 5 to c's function A (via fn)
    fn = &Class::B;   // fn now points to B within any Class
    (p->*fn)(6);      // Pass 6 to c's (via p) function B (via fn)
} // main()

Unlike pointers to member variables (in the previous example), the association between the class instance and the member pointer need to be bound tightly together with parentheses, which looks a little strange (as though the .* and ->* aren’t strange enough!)

Feedback about page:

Feedback:
Optional: your email if you want me to get back to you:


Pointers to class / struct members:
* Syntax
* Pointers to member functions

Table Of Contents
8 Arrays
11 Loops
39 Streams
48 Pointers to class / struct members
51 Unions
56 Lambdas
60 SFINAE
62 RAII
67 Sorting
84 RTTI
87 Scopes
104 Profiling
107 Recursion
117 Iteration
125 Alignment
134 Semaphore
136 Debugging
139 Mutexes
142 decltype