Base example without covariant returns shows why theyre desirable

suggest change
// 1. Base example not using language support for covariance, dynamic type checking.

class Top
{
public:
    virtual Top* clone() const = 0;
    virtual ~Top() = default;       // Necessary for `delete` via Top*.
};

class D : public Top
{

public:
    Top* clone() const override
    { return new D( *this ); }
};

class DD : public D
{
private:
    int answer_ = 42;

public:
    int answer() const
    { return answer_;}

    Top* clone() const override
    { return new DD( *this ); }
};

#include <assert.h>
#include <iostream>
#include <typeinfo>
using namespace std;

int main()
{
    cout << boolalpha;

    DD* p1 = new DD();
    Top* p2 = p1->clone();
    bool const  correct_dynamic_type = (typeid( *p2 ) == typeid( DD ));
    cout << correct_dynamic_type << endl;               // "true"

    assert( correct_dynamic_type ); // This is essentially dynamic type checking. :(
    auto p2_most_derived = static_cast<DD*>( p2 );
    cout << p2_most_derived->answer() << endl;          // "42"
    delete p2;
    delete p1;
}

Feedback about page:

Feedback:
Optional: your email if you want me to get back to you:


Return type covariance:
* Base example without covariant returns shows why theyre desirable

Table Of Contents
8 Arrays
11 Loops
39 Streams
51 Unions
56 Lambdas
60 SFINAE
62 RAII
67 Sorting
84 RTTI
87 Scopes
104 Profiling
105 Return type covariance
107 Recursion
117 Iteration
125 Alignment
134 Semaphore
136 Debugging
139 Mutexes
142 decltype